Long-term efficacy of antireflux mucosectomy in patients with refractory gastroesophageal reflux disease.

OBJECTIVES: Minimally invasive treatments have been applied for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), but the long-term results are controversial. Antireflux mucosectomy (ARMS) is a simple endoscopic procedure that does not require the insertion of a foreign body. We provide the first report on the long-term results of ARMS. METHODS: This was a single-center, single-arm trial, prospective study of 88 patients with proton pump inhibitor (PPI)-refractory GERD who underwent ARMS between June 2012 and June 2017. Primary outcomes were the rates of long-term effectiveness and PPI discontinuation. Secondary outcomes were to compare patients' preoperative background characteristics, questionnaire, and multichannel intraluminal impedance and pH monitoring data to examine the predictive factors of ARMS. The clinical course was reviewed, including the need for additional treatment after ARMS. RESULTS: Antireflux mucosectomy produced a long-term effect in 68.3% of the patients, and PPI could be discontinued in 42% of patients. There were significant differences in age, intensity of preoperative symptoms, and acid-related indicators. Forty-five percent (27/60) had reflux hypersensitivity and ARMS provided long-term effectiveness in 81% of these patients. There was no significant difference in subjective symptom assessment between those with short-term and long-term efficacy. Additional treatment was administered in 23% (14/60) and scheduled at 1-2 years' follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Antireflux mucosectomy showed long-term efficacy, and many of the cases with short-term effects were able to maintain them. In addition, ARMS is also effective in patients with reflux hypersensitivity, and provides a treatment option that bridges the gap between surgical and medical treatment.

Clinical outcomes of anti-reflux mucosal ablation for gastroesophageal reflux disease: An international bi-institutional study.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Anti-reflux mucosal ablation (ARMA) is an emerging endoscopic treatment aimed at enhancing the gastroesophageal junction flap valve. This study aimed to evaluate its feasibility, effectiveness, and safety. METHODS: Between May 2018 and December 2022, patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) symptoms refractory to acid suppression medications or those dependent on such medications were enrolled for ARMA. This retrospective analysis utilized prospectively collected data from an international bi-center study. GERD questionnaire, upper endoscopy, and 24-h pH monitoring were conducted at 2-6 months and 12 months post-ARMA. Clinical success was defined as a > 50% reduction in a validated GERD questionnaire. RESULTS: A total of 68 patients underwent ARMA. Definitive GERD was diagnosed in 44 (64.7%) patients, while 24 (35.3%) exhibited reflux hypersensitivity. Clinical success rates at 2-6 months and 1 year post-ARMA were 60% (39/65) and 70% (21/30), respectively. The median GERD-health-related quality of life score significantly improved from 26 to 11 at 2-6 months (P < 0.001). Among the 51 patients (71.8%) who underwent 24-h pH monitoring, the median acid exposure time decreased from 5.3% to 0.7% (P = 0.003), accompanied by a significant reduction in esophagitis rates (P < 0.001). Multivariate analysis did not identify predictors of short-term success. Nine (13.2%) patients experienced transient stenosis requiring balloon dilation. CONCLUSIONS: ARMA demonstrates both technical feasibility and reproducibility as a safe procedure that effectively ameliorates GERD symptoms in approximately two-thirds of patients during short-term follow up. Both reflux hypersensitivity and confirmed GERD patients, regardless of their response to acid suppression medication, may be suitable candidates.

"Loop-10" line-assisted clip closure method: closure of perforation in re-do peroral endoscopic myotomy.

Video 1Demonstration of the Loop-10 closure technique for unintentional mucosal perforation during re-do esophageal peroral endoscopic myotomy.

A potential preventive method for scar stenosis after esophageal endoscopic mucosal resection using human amniotic epithelial cells in a porcine model.

Objectives: The current methods employed for esophageal endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) involve the risk of adverse postprocedural complications. Therefore, this study aimed to develop a new method to prevent stenosis following a resection procedure using human amniotic epithelial cells in a porcine model. Methods: With the consent of a woman who underwent a cesarean section, amniotic epithelial cells were isolated from the amniotic membrane of the delivered placenta. Six swine were used for this study. Under general anesthesia, four EMRs using cap-fitted microscope ulcers were performed on each porcine esophagus. Of the four ulcers, the two on the oral side were treated by injecting human amniotic epithelial (AE group) cells, and the remaining two on the anal side were left untreated (control group). One week after the procedure, the swine were sacrificed, and the ulcers were evaluated. The epithelialization rate was calculated by dividing the length of the epithelialized portion of each section by the length of the ulcer, which was determined using an optical microscope. Moreover, the mucosal thickening in each section was measured in terms of diameter. Results: The epithelialization rate was significantly higher in the AE group than in the control group. Mucosal thickening was not significantly different between the groups. Conclusions: Transplanting amniotic epithelial cells into the ulcer promoted ulcer epithelialization. Amniotic epithelial cell transplantation is a potential method for the management of ulcer scar stenosis following esophageal endoscopic submucosal dissection.

Definitive Chemoradiotherapy with Docetaxel, Cisplatin, and 5-Fluorouracil for Advanced Cervical Esophageal Cancer: A Medium-Term Outcome.

BACKGROUND: Definitive chemoradiotherapy (dCRT) is widely considered as a treatment option for cervical esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) toward preserving the larynx. We have reported favorable outcomes, including the treatment response rate and short-term survival of dCRT concomitant with docetaxel, cisplatin, and 5-fluorouracil (DCF-RT) for advanced cervical ESCC. The aim of this paper was to report the subsequent progress of the study. METHODS: We assessed 18 patients with advanced (clinical stage II-IV, including T4b and/or M1 lymph node) cervical ESCC at our department who received DCF-RT as the first-line treatment between December 2010 and June 2020. RESULTS: A total of 14 men and 4 women underwent the study regimen. The pretreatment clinical stage included stage II, stage III, stage IVA, and stage IVB cases (including 9 patients with T4b) [8 trachea and 2 thyroids] and 7 patients with the M1 lymph node. The complete response (CR) was achieved in 15 patients, stable disease in 2, and progressive disease in 1. Of 15 patients with CR, 7 experienced recurrence, and 8 had continued CR. Frequent cases of grade ≥3 adverse effects included leucopenia, neutropenia, febrile neutropenia, and pharyngeal pain. The 3-year overall survival rate, disease-free survival rate, and disease-specific survival rate were 44.2%, 47.7%, and 48.6%, respectively. CONCLUSION: DCF-RT for advanced cervical esophageal cancer could achieve a favorable prognosis with larynx preservation. Further observations are warranted to establish the long-term prognosis, late complications of radiotherapy, and the significance of salvage surgery.

A case of esophageal achalasia presenting with empyema and septic shock differentiated from esophageal rupture.

The patient was a 44-year-old man with a history of schizophrenia. He had a history of esophageal dysphagia and vomiting and presented with sudden strong epigastric pain. He was taken to a medical emergency center in a state of septic shock. Computed tomography revealed a left thoracic abscess, and esophageal rupture was suspected. He was referred to our department for treatment. Gastrointestinal series and gastrointestinal endoscopy revealed marked esophageal dilation and strong contraction of the lower esophageal sphincter. We, therefore, diagnosed the patient with empyema thoracis secondary to aspiration pneumonia due to esophageal achalasia. Conservative treatment with antibiotics and computed tomography-guided chest drainage was initiated, but the inflammation persisted. Thus, we successfully performed a per-oral endoscopic myotomy to manage achalasia symptoms.

[Per-oral endoscopic myotomy for esophageal achalasia following distal gastrectomy].

The patient was a male in his 70s with a history of distal gastrectomy and Billroth-I reconstruction. He was suspected of having esophageal achalasia and was started on calcium blockers in X-2 year. The symptoms worsened, and he presented to our hospital in X year. We diagnosed esophageal achalasia (Chicago classification ver. 3.0;type I), and conducted per-oral endoscopic myotomy (POEM). His postoperative course was uneventful with no postoperative symptoms. In cases of esophageal achalasia following distal gastrectomy, it is important to consider adhesions, mobility of the remaining stomach, and preservation of the short gastric artery and vein. Since the Heller-Dor operation can be difficult, POEM may be a reasonable alternative in these cases.

Modified keyhole technique for the treatment of parastomal hernia: A case series.

INTRODUCTION: Parastomal hernia is one of the common complications of permanent stoma, and its incidence was nearly 50%. Surgical management is challenging and associated with relatively high recurrence rate. Mesh repair was demonstrated to reduce recurrence compared to non-mesh repair, and modified Surgerbaker and keyhole technique are the most cited intraperitoneal mesh repairs. In the keyhole technique, recurrence often occurs by herniation through the central hole. We present four parastomal hernia cases successfully repaired by modified keyhole technique, in which a cylinder-shaped synthetic mesh was attached to the keyhole mesh to cover the angle between the keyhole and the bowel. PRESENTATION OF CASES: There were 1 male and 3 females with mean BMI of 25.7 kg/m2. Mean operative time was 114 min. There were two end-colostomies, one loop-ileostomy and one ileal conduit cases. Postoperative complication was observed in two cases, which was cerebral infarction and paralytic ileus. There were neither infectious complications nor seroma formation, and mean postoperative hospital stay was 18 days. With mean follow-up time of 36 months (range 10-66), we experienced no recurrence. CONCLUSIONS: Having lower recurrence rate, the modified Sugerbaker technique is considered preferable over the keyhole technique, but the bowel going to the stoma needs to be lateralized enough to be covered by relatively large mesh, which is not always accomplished. In such instances, our modified keyhole technique would be a feasible alternative.